Thank you all for your posts. This is a great start. Please feel free to comment on each other's posts, as well. This is a great way to keep a productive and intellectually stimulating dialogue going outside of class.
Due to the campus closure this past Thursday, please have your "WTB Money" cuts ready to screen for the class on Tuesday.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Thursday, February 13, 2014
"The Editor"
“The Editor,” By: Breanna Scott
What do editors do?
They do not just cut film; they bring the story to life.
During the beginning of the film industry there were no
editors. People filmed until they were bored or ran out of film. The Lumieres
thought the world of cinema had no future. But guess who was wrong… The invention of editing allowed films to take
off and give birth to a new art and language. Editing can slow down and speed up
time, evoke emotions, and sometimes startle or amuse us. Editing can also make
or break a film, so each frame is important. Even if you miss an edit by one
frame, you can screw up the entire scene. You want to make sure the scene flows
seamlessly in order to create the perfect edit. In order to help the story flow
perfectly, you need to do an invisible cut. Griffith understood the
significance of editing, and he popularized techniques which defined proper
editing.
In editing, it’s all about the rhythm. When you have the
right rhythm down, you can start to focus on the musical score. The musical
score can also make or break a film. Sometimes music is placed in a certain
scene, which helps evoke a certain emotion, and makes it Oscar worthy. Or music
can be placed somewhere and it does not make any sense at all. Sometimes you do
not need music in a shot. Sometimes the natural sounds are a better fit for the
cut. As an editor, you have to ask yourself; when not to cut, when to have silence,
when to drag out the scene.
For years, editors
were the best kept secret of the movies. The editor and director spend the most
time together. Basically they are the Batman and Robin in the film industry. Together they create the stars we know today.
The editor helps enhance a great actor’s performance and the director helps
capture it. Great directors and editors such as Michael Scorsese, Steven Spielberg,
Michael Kahn, George Lucas, Dede Allen, just to name a few, have done just that.
Editing can shape hearts and minds of an audience. Sure
minute details are important in film editing, but you also have to look at the big
picture as well.
Throughout “The Cutting Edge: The Making of Movie Magic,”
they referenced some of my favorite films of all time, such as Star Wars, Jaws,
and Titanic. Films, such as these, made me want to go in the film industry to
begin with. At first I wanted to be a director or an actress, but now I know
where the real story develops from. The Editor.
The Cutting Edge Film
The film “Cutting Edge” was a very interesting piece on
editing. I found it very informative and it hit very important parts on
editing. I liked how it described cropping scenes and flowing the together. I
further enjoyed when the different editors talked about their styles and how
they edit clips based on how they think it will best fit because it provides
incite and shows us how many different views there are when it comes to editing
a movie or television show. I found it interesting when the different editors
talked about how they do transitions from outside in one scene to inside in
another scene if it takes place in the same building. For example the clip of
the man walking up to the building and walking into the building and matching
up the door opening on the inside to get a clear cut and a good
transition. The technique of jump cuts
was also something I found interesting. It was interesting to see that an
editor could jump from on cut to the next all in the same scene if there was
nothing major or nothing happening with in the scene. I thought that maybe it
would look off and the scene would not look right and just look like a bunch of
cuts however it looks nice and actually brings the piece together and helps it
move the scene along with out creating any gaps with in the scene. An editor is
a very pivotal person in creating a film because they cut and put the film
together. They decide for the most part which scenes make the storyline
progress and flow at a pace that will not lose the audiences interest and drag
out the storyline. With out editors
films would just be random scenes put together that did not make sense. This
film showed the importance of that and the importance of different editing
tools and styles.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Thoughts about The Cutting Edge
When I first heard of the title of
this movie, all I thought it was about some new piece of technology that was so
cutting edge it could help the film industry. Soon after I began watching the
movie, I quickly found out that it was more than that. It’s about the editors
behind the movie that make the story of the movie come together. Cutting and trimming the film that was
directed and shot is what made movies what they are today.
What I liked about this movie is
that it shows how important editors are to movies. I will never look at another
movie the same way. Why won’t I you ask?
Because now when I watch a scene of a movie I will think about how many different
views the scene was shot at and how it could have looked different if the editor
wanted it to be changed. Not only does the editor trim and cut films, they
create how the story is seen. This is very important because for example, in
the movie terminator 2 the editor wanted everyone to see that not only was the
kid on the dirt bike being chased by someone that wanted to kill him, you saw
how violent he was to try and catch up to him. The editor showed different views
of the truck taking so much damage so that the bad guy could catch up to him. If
the editor just showed the kid getting chased it wouldn't be as exciting as
seeing the truck getting destroyed along the way.
Imagine a world without editors,
how would movies be watched without all the correct angles of the film pieced
together? Would the story still be as effective if it wasn't trimmed and cut
the correct way? We would never know because there will always be editors
around to make a story understandable and exciting to watch.
The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing
The Cutting
Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing was an interesting look at one of the most
important components of creating a film, which is the editor. In a sense,
without the editor there would be no movie; or at least it wouldn't make sense.
The editor is in a way, god. He controls time, and space in a way that shapes
the viewers response to what they see on the big screen. Editing can slow down
time, or speed it up which by itself is very fascinating. I think editors are
almost more important than the director, because without the editor there is no
film in a way.
The editor and the director should work hand
in hand at creating the film. Sometimes the director gets lucky and is on the
same page as the editor. As Quentin Tarantino said, having a female editor is
usually better because they don’t shove their agenda down your throat; they
usually help nurture and create the film alongside you, not against you.
D.W.
Griffith was the first to understand the psychological part of editing. He was
the first man to use the close up. People wanted to see the whole body of the
actor or actress but slowly started to realize that the close up created
emphasis on the scene, and further enhanced the viewers encapsulation of the
film.
The movie “Birth of a Nation” was the first
movie to have many features of classical film editing. The goal was to mask the
cut so that the audience barely notices that it was cut. I was really
fascinated with the documentary especially seeing the parts of editing one
doesn't normally get to see. Being an IT major and not a productions major I’m
more interested in the technical process more than anything, but after watching
the film it really made me interested in all of the other parts of editing. It was also really interesting to see the many
different styles of editing many different types of film. No matter what I’ll
always be fascinated by how many people it takes to make a AAA film. I might
not pursue a career in editing but I know that after this class I will have a
much more appreciated view on film and the process it takes to create one,
especially by the editor.
The Cutting Edge (Blog #1)
In lieu of tracing a sort of thematic thread, I’ve decided
to simply comment on certain insights that I took note of while watching—given
that the assignment, and blogs in general, are somewhat informal.
The first being an opening quote from Anthony Minghella:
“film is the sum of editing.” Conceptually, I think this is a useful lense to
view editing through—especially as the interviews progress, and individual
frames are compared to the likes of puzzle pieces, and Walter Murch gives the
visual of boxes within boxes. As a student having not only no prior editing
experience, but also no prior knowledge of editing whatsoever (for it is
invisible), it’s helpful to view frames as parts of a collective whole; and I
think it’s important to conceptualize this well before critically thinking
about the cuts themselves.
Secondly, I took note of the importance of a single
frame—the discussion of Jaws, but more specifically, Quentin Tarantino: “one
frame off, or two frames added, or two fames less, is the difference between a
sour note and a sweet note […] between clunky, clumsy crap and orgasmic
rhythm.” It seems this is a tenet of editing—a fraction of a second can
influence the psychology of an entire film. Having said that, while I
thoroughly enjoy his films, I’m making an honest attempt to avoid hearing
Tarantino speak ever again; guy’s a lunatic—I’d much rather listen to Scorsese
talk (or David Lynch—I wish they got him on here).
I don’t have anything necessarily insightful to say about
the relationship between director and editor; I was simply previously unaware
of this level of artistic interaction, and likening it to marriage is
interesting (as was more lunacy from Tarantino).
Alexander Payne thinks of editors as “really sly
politicians.” I loved this comparison; “the emotional, psychological effect
from a certain type of cutting […] the manipulation” (Scorsese). Stalin is
discussed here, as is Hitler in the later half of the film—but I fully intend
on looking into the Why We Fight series
from the US; film [and editing] as a manipulative agent is a truly remarkable
phenomena. Examining editing as such allows for a case study not only on the
power of film in itself, but on a reflection of the human psyche—on its
fallibility and on its interpretation of film as sensory experience. In this
sense, it seems editors do have the ability [without hyperbole] to create
alternative, symbolic realities; and the simulacrum has the ability to affect
rational order.
The segment on the same face being intercut with varying
images does a great job in explicitly illustrating the power of juxtaposition;
and the editor as controller of actors’ performances is worth noting.
I like the idea of Spielberg’s editor as the “most objective
eye.” As he says, the editor hasn’t been “inundate[d]” by the film—in this
sense, the editor is the first viewer, a watcher that is to experience the
unmediated emotion of the picture.
I suppose, technically speaking, what I’ve taken away from
the documentary echoes your own insights upon taking a look at my first cut—editing
insofar as the manipulation of time—the ability to slow time and speed it up
through cuts, developing pacing through breaths and pauses.
A few more final highlights: Murch’s description of editing
as “a dance of eyes,” and ‘carrying attention,’ and getting your final cut by
banging on the keyboard at random.
The Cutting Edge
The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Editing: This documentary was very insight full
and contained so much knowledge on the role of editors, and specifically where
and when editing began. It begins with
how editing first came, about. Early
editing was very basic and was not seen as a creative process like we see it
today. This documentary explains how it
is in the editing room where the movie actually becomes a “movie”.
This documentary uses many famous movie
as examples which I loved because it gives you some “behind the scene knowledge”.
They interviewed one of my favorite directors Quinton Tarantino. Who explains how important a good editor
is. Tarantino wanted a woman to be his
editor for his first film because he believed she would be much more nurturing to
his film and try to make his film as close to what he wants as much as
possible. They also interview editors and directors who talk about how just
simple editing like adding two frames, or subtracting two frames can
drastically change the way the scene looks and feels. An example of this is in Jaws, how by just
having two extra frames made the shark look completely fake but without those
two shots they were able to create a realistic, terrifying monster. This documentary was very interesting to me
as I would love to pursue editing as a future career.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)