After reading
about and researching Walter Murch, I have found that he is a very intriguing
and talented film editor. In his book,
“In The Blink Of An Eye”, Murch discusses many different theories and ideas of
his, one of them being “The Rule of Six”.
To me, this was one of the most valuable pieces of information I have
obtained through reading this book. I
found his argument very convincing that emotion (51%) and story (23%) overpowers
the other 4 criteria’s of editing which include rhythym (10%), eye trace (7%),
Two-dimensional plane of screen (5%) and three-dimensional space of action
(4%). Murch states that you should try
to preserve emotion at all costs, even if it means sacrificing one of the other
criteria’s on the list. I completely
agree with Murch on this, because a characters/cut’s emotion can really drive a
movie forward and if you have a cut that gives the right emotion you need, then
it should be used even if it doesn’t follow one of the other criteria’s listed.
One of the chapter’s I found
extremely interesting was Cuts and Shadow
Cuts. In this chapter, Murch talks
about the amount of film he had to work for the movie Apocalypse Now. He said
had a whopping 230 hours worth of film, which by the final cut of the film, was
95 unseen minutes of film for every 1 minute of film used in the final
cut. That is a tremendous amount of
footage for a feature film, and I think that is one of the reason’s why Murch’s
editing on this film was so successful.
He says that the more you have to work with the better, and he certainly
proved that to be true in Apocalypse Now.
Another part of
Murch’s editing analysis I found to be interesting was his comparison of an
overactive editing to a tour guide who can’t stop pointing things out. I found this to be hilariously true. Murch says that when you’re on a tour, you
want the guide to point things out, but you also want to be able to walk around
and “see the things that you see”. This is the same for editor who is trying to
do too much. Too much manipulation while
editing is trying to have complete control.
This can be detrimental to a film as people watching will “feel
constrained then resentful from the constant pressure of the editor’s hand on
the back of their necks.” This is
awesome is advice for me becaus trying to make too many cuts has been a problem
for me at times, and Murch’s advice that less can be more will really help me
in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment