Thoughts on
Linearity
Before non-linear editing started around the
1990’s, there was linear editing.
Linear video editing is defined as a “video editing post-production process of selecting, arranging and modifying images
and sound in a predetermined, order sequence. Regardless of
whether it was captured by a video camera, tapeless camcorder, or recorded in a television studio on a video tape recorder the content must be accessed sequentially."
Non-linear editing (NLE) is
defined as “a method that allows you to access any frame in a digital video clip regardless of sequence in the clip. The freedom to access any
frame, and use a cut-and-paste method, similar to the ease of cutting and
pasting text in a word processor, and allows you to easily include fades,
transitions, and other effects that cannot be achieved with linear editing.”
For the most part video editing software has replaced linear editing; software programs such as Avid
and Final Cut Pro (FCP).
Being
able to juxtapose and manipulate images (NLE) helps us as editors create
stories and develop characters in film. Editors are the true story tellers.
Sure we have the director who directs the type of image and motions he/she
wants captured on film or the camera crew that captures the image that attracts
our eyes, but it’s the editors that sew together the story. With non-linear
editing you are able to pick and choose which scenes or moments you want to use
in your film. That way you can have multiple takes and choose which one you
think fits best. Being able to pick a choose from a plethora of images, rather
than taking one shot and trying to match it perfectly to the image you filmed
before and hand cutting it perfectly using film, and juxtaposing them makes it
easier to edit film. Plus you can create the perfect moment/scene. Say if the
actor says one line great and the others not so great in one take and they say
the other lines better in the other; the editor can just mesh the two together
to create a great scene.
In films such as Night and Fog (Resnais, 1955), a documentary, and JFK (Stone, 1991), a drama history
thriller, demonstrate the different possibilities linearity can create. In Night and Fog (Resnais) is a short
documentary film about “The history of
Nazi Germany's death camps of the Final Solution and the hellish world of
dehumanization and death contained inside.” By using archived footage and
juxtaposing them a certain way the editors created a powerful film. I felt
myself looking away from the screen for a brief second when the scenes became
too powerful. Images do speak louder than words. Sure they had a commentator
for the film, but when you see the piles of dead bodies being pushed around by
plows like they were garbage and the other decrepit bodies, it evokes different
emotions such as sadness. Rather than a documentary film, JFK (Stone), a feature length film, a film about “a New Orleans District Attorney discovers there's more
to the Kennedy assassination than the official story,” Stone created a
film by utilizing actors, rather than archived footage, to create scenes that evoke
different responses about a historical happening. Stone is
able to manipulate time by using flashbacks, going against linearity, to create scenes that are key in the film.
Don't confuse non-linear editing software with non-linear storytelling (this is probably my fault). The Moviola, invented in the 1920s, is a non-linear editing machine. Also, prior to this editors cut by hand with scissors and tape. This could easily be done non-linearly.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, I hate the "non-linear" in the title of our class. It becomes confusing when we discuss non-linear storytelling in films like "Citizen Kane" and "JFK". Sorry for the confusion. Hopefully, this clarifies for everyone.